Forest Owlet
Lost for 113 years. Found in a forest that survived only because local communities protected it
No confirmed photograph exists
Location
Khandesh region, Maharashtra, India
Overview
The forest owlet was collected in central India in the 1870s and 1880s and then not seen again for 113 years. By the 1990s most ornithologists assumed it was extinct. In 1997, American ornithologist Pamela Rasmussen used the original collection notebooks to identify the localities where specimens had been taken, traveled to the Shahada region of Maharashtra, and found living birds in a small patch of mixed deciduous forest. The forest had survived surrounded by farmland specifically because local communities had maintained it through traditional land management. The discovery made international ornithological news. Then it became more complicated: Rasmussen subsequently proved that several 19th-century type specimens in a British museum had been fraudulently relabeled by a collector who had falsified data across dozens of species for decades.
Why haven't we found it?
The 113-year gap is partly explained by the forest owlet's habits — it sits silently and motionlessly on low branches during the day and is genuinely easy to overlook. But 113 years without a single record from a region with active ornithological fieldwork is still striking. Part of the answer may be that the species was always geographically restricted to a narrow band of forest in the Khandesh region, and the forest patches it required were fragmenting rapidly in the second half of the 20th century.
How it was found
- 1
Rasmussen's rediscovery came entirely from archival research — she located the original collection field notes, identified the specific localities, and searched them systematically. The bird was there. The information to find it had been in museum archives for over a century.
- 2
Since 1997, several additional populations have been found at scattered sites across Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra, suggesting the species survived in isolated forest fragments that no one had thought to check.
- 3
The Indian government has designated specific forest owlet sites as protected areas and active nest box programmes have been established at known breeding locations.
Things worth knowing
- 1
The fraudulent relabeling that Rasmussen uncovered involved the Victorian collector Richard Meinertzhagen, who had stolen and mislabeled specimens from museums across Europe and faked expedition data for decades. The forest owlet case was one of the most prominent exposures of what became a significant scandal in museum ornithology.
- 2
The forest owlet belongs to its own genus — Heteroglaux — with no close living relatives among Indian owls. It represents an isolated evolutionary lineage.
- 3
Despite being rediscovered in 1997, the species' breeding biology was not documented until 2008 — eleven years after the rediscovery, researchers still had not found an active nest.
- 4
The Shahada forest where the owlet was refound had been protected by the local Bhil community through traditional practices. It was not a government reserve. The bird's survival was a direct consequence of that protection.
- 5
The forest owlet hunts by perching on low branches and watching the ground, then dropping onto lizards, mice, and large insects. Its complete stillness during the day and its low perch height make it effectively invisible to anyone not specifically looking for it.